<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building flexibility into business planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomspencer.com.au/2009/06/11/build-flexibility-into-business-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomspencer.com.au/2009/06/11/build-flexibility-into-business-planning/</link>
	<description>An evolving perspective on management consulting, business strategy and investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:28:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: astri</title>
		<link>http://www.tomspencer.com.au/2009/06/11/build-flexibility-into-business-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-3311</link>
		<dc:creator>astri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomspencer.com.au/?p=1806#comment-3311</guid>
		<description>the capm does not work in the real world i reckon. 

there are too many arguments around capm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the capm does not work in the real world i reckon. </p>
<p>there are too many arguments around capm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: z</title>
		<link>http://www.tomspencer.com.au/2009/06/11/build-flexibility-into-business-planning/comment-page-1/#comment-2997</link>
		<dc:creator>z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 07:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomspencer.com.au/?p=1806#comment-2997</guid>
		<description>This is actually a criticism I have of my finance curriculum too.

A lot of finance is &quot;shooting in the dark&quot;, in that most methods are underpinned by assumptions which are not very rigorous.

Essentially, the price of a security is what the agreed upon price that a seller and buyer transact it for. Whether the seller and buyer uses CAPM, constant dividend growth model, APT or some other model for what the price &quot;should&quot; be doesn&#039;t matter unless the buyer/seller acts upon that prediction.

Or so I believe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually a criticism I have of my finance curriculum too.</p>
<p>A lot of finance is &#8220;shooting in the dark&#8221;, in that most methods are underpinned by assumptions which are not very rigorous.</p>
<p>Essentially, the price of a security is what the agreed upon price that a seller and buyer transact it for. Whether the seller and buyer uses CAPM, constant dividend growth model, APT or some other model for what the price &#8220;should&#8221; be doesn&#8217;t matter unless the buyer/seller acts upon that prediction.</p>
<p>Or so I believe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
