<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Career choice: consulting versus investment banking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomspencer.com.au/2008/05/18/consulting-vs-ib/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomspencer.com.au/2008/05/18/consulting-vs-ib/</link>
	<description>An evolving perspective on management consulting, business strategy and investing</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: zs</title>
		<link>http://www.tomspencer.com.au/2008/05/18/consulting-vs-ib/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>zs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 12:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomspencer.com.au/?p=22#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Good comparison Tom.

The only qualifier I'd put around the "numbers focused" comparison is that Investment Banking requires a deeper understanding of Finance (financial engineering, instruments, rigorous company valuation) whereas a Management Consultant is expected to be more of a generalist - in the first few years and certainly at the interview stage of the process. Just the nature of these beasts.

I'd be curious which one is expected to be the sharper dresser though, something I focus on at my blog - I may just have to give this one to the Bankers... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comparison Tom.</p>
<p>The only qualifier I&#8217;d put around the &#8220;numbers focused&#8221; comparison is that Investment Banking requires a deeper understanding of Finance (financial engineering, instruments, rigorous company valuation) whereas a Management Consultant is expected to be more of a generalist - in the first few years and certainly at the interview stage of the process. Just the nature of these beasts.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious which one is expected to be the sharper dresser though, something I focus on at my blog - I may just have to give this one to the Bankers&#8230; <img src='http://www.tomspencer.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
